The objective of this paper is to review the outcomes achieved with the cosmoethical paranormative-theatical model of the consciential neoparadigm, through the guiding thread of the holomemoriology specialty on self-research – the self-research of consciousness. The author presents a brief historical retrospective of over four decades of parascientific contributions from the neosciences projectiology (1981) and conscientiology (1986). The pararesearch methodology is based on exhaustive technical consultation of the historical documentary collection of the Holomemory of Conscientiology (HLM). Through systematic self-experimentation, the intraphysical consciousness (conscin) discovers the paramechanism of integral memory (holomemory), located in the parabrain, crossing paradigmatic, chronological, and interdimensional barriers between physical realities and pararealities. The self-convincing re-verifiability of paraphenomena leads the self-parapsychic neoscientist to a definitive disruption regarding the pseudo-obscurity of projectability, introjecting the binomial expression pararesearch of self-consciousness–self-research of the consciousness. Through cosmoethical self-thosenity, advanced autogenous instruments of analytical self-investigation or intraconscientiality (inner self) are finally made available to the lucid conscin, towards the holomaturological metacognition of their consciential microuniverse. Parafacts guide one’s self-research.
This paper is the result of a partial analysis of larger ongoing research. This author’s specialty is the study of emotions in the context of human relationships, and this was the motivating factor for the beginning of this work. The specific objective of this paper is to present a comparison between information contained in the treatise Projectiology (Vieira, 1999) on emotions and feelings and information from recent research in the field of neuroscience. It is considered that the objective of this study was achieved, and also that knowledge presented in the treatise was highlighted, surpassed by recent neuroscientific research. However, there is still much to be studied in the field of emotions and their relationships with the holosoma, especially regarding the action of the psychosoma. It is understood that it is of great importance to include new discoveries from affective neuroscience in consciential self-research, with the aim to expand and update the verpons on the holosoma.